
For years, cardiology practices have served patients according to the fee-for-service (FFS) model. But this approach is rapidly becoming obsolete as most cardiologists are shifting to value-based care (VBC) models. This means instead of charging patients based on the number of services and procedures, they are now focusing on quality care, patient outcomes, and cost effectiveness.
This shift is particularly important for small cardiology practices. This is because it provides them with the basic framework to navigate the rule book while ensuring superior patient care, especially to aging population with chronic conditions.
Adopting value-based care models in cardiology is crucial also because heart diseases are a leading cause of death worldwide. These models help create an ecosystem where it is easy to provide sustainable, result-oriented services. This also helps counter rising costs of chronic care.
In this blog, we will discuss the rising trends and methods that VBC models have introduced in the cardiology care landscape. Let’s get started.
Value-based care is a healthcare provision model where billing happens solely based on the quality of care. In cardiology, this model helps reduce costly hospitalizations while providing effective management of chronic conditions like hypertension and cardiac failure. It provides a win-win framework for long-term patient care.
The transitioning from FFS to VBC in healthcare has been happening for a decade. The authorities overseeing this shift are the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), and the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). This entire initiative mainly promotes alternative payment models, which include pay-for-performance and bundled payment models. These models guide reimbursement protocols based on patient satisfaction and hospital readmission.
The particular models cardiology practices are adopting include Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (PBCI) and Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). These models focus on collaboration between specialties for better coordination, effective management of chronic conditions, and hospital readmission reduction.
Cardiology practices are quickly shifting to bundled payment programs. Under these programs, cardiologists get reimbursed for complete episodes of treatment, e.g., follow-up care provided after a heart surgery. The significant benefit of these models is that cardiologists get incentivized to collaborate with other providers instead of performing unnecessary procedures.
According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), this trend of bundled payment adoption is going to rise further. This would ultimately result in better cost savings and improved patient outcomes.
Chronic Care Management (CCM)
Today, chronic heart conditions like cardiac failure and atrial fibrillation are more prevalent than ever. This makes chronic care management the need of the hour. Cardiologists have complied with this requirement quite well by offering CCM services, which include consistent patient monitoring, personalized treatments, and coordinated care. The rise of CCM services especially aims to reduce hospitalizations. This can be of great benefit for independent cardiology practices.
In fact, CCM services have already been able to reduce hospitalization rates by 20% in patients with cardiovascular conditions.
The concept of telehealth and remote monitoring got major traction during the COVID-19 period. Its popularity rose steadily even after the pandemic. One of the leading specialties that benefited from this concept was cardiology.
Today, practices commonly use remote patient monitoring dashboards to view vital signs, check blood pressure, and track the heart rate. This has made it easy to plan interventions on time or even preemptively. A 2022 study by the Journal of the American Heart Association reported that cardiology practices had been able to reduce emergency room visits by 25% by using RPM.
The recent years initiated the era of AI and machine learning, which benefited many domains, with healthcare at the top. This evolution specifically helped cardiology practices by introducing advanced analytics for predicting patient risk, creating treatment plans, and monitoring outcomes. Practices can now identify patients with a high risk of heart attack and plan interventions accordingly. And by using data insights, they can improve outcomes while making sure they meet VBC guidelines.
Value-based care models offer great opportunities in revenue cycle management. But they have also made the process more challenging. For instance, cardiology practices now must deal with billing intricacies associated with bundled payments and reimbursements based on quality-based care. They also have to handle the complexities of risk-sharing agreements. And as a result, they must rely on advanced RCM systems that can process claims based on quality-related KPIs. All this indeed adds an extra layer of compliance challenges.
Value-based care has changed the way cardiology practices treat their patients and get reimbursed. This model has specifically opened a great window of opportunity for independent practices to solidify their standing in the industry. But at the same time, it has necessitated adopting quality metrics, bringing innovation to care provision, and using the latest RCM technology.
Enter Your Email Address. We Promise We Won't Spam You
Enter your email to receive our newsletter, so you can stay in the loop with our latest promos.